Peer Review
Cancer Imaging
ISSN 1470-7330
Search site with:PicoSearch


Content
Current Issue
Archive
Related Journals / Articles
Information
Aims and Scope
Editors and Board
Editorial Policy
Instructions for Authors
Copyright Transfer Form
Subscription Information
Advertising
Society
Aims
Membership
Annual Meeting
Communications
Send Email to ICIS
e-Med
Visit e-Med Web Site
Journals
Purchase
“To Promote Education in Cancer Imaging in the Multidisciplinary Management of Malignancy”

Home > Articles

Image guided biopsy in the management of cancer of the ovary Open Access Article

Abstract

When used in the context of multidisciplinary team discussion, image guided biopsy using ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) guidance is of value in planning management of women with suspected ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of uncertain aetiology. It is essential in women believed to have ovarian cancer but with poor performance status or with advanced disease believed beyond the scope of primary cytoreductive surgery for whom staging surgical pathology will not be obtained. It provides a site-specific primary tumour diagnosis in 93% of cases and it should replace diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy for this purpose. It allows provision of primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy based on a firm histological diagnosis. It is mandatory in women with a history of cancer whose metastases may mimic ovarian cancer (e.g. breast, GI tract, melanoma). More women with prior breast cancer who re-present with peritoneal cancer will have a new gynaecological primary than recurrence of their original primary tumour; the two options require radically different therapies. Finally it is a valuable problem solving tool in situations of diagnostic uncertainty, e.g. unusual imaging patterns of disease such as PC with bilateral solid ovarian masses or non-enlarged ovaries and with an unusual tumour marker profiles suggesting primary tumours outwith the ovary. The technique is simple, safe and effective and can be combined with palliative drainage of ascites at the same procedure.

Author

John A Spencer, Kirsty Anderson, Michael Weston, Nafisa Wilkinson and Matt Hewitt

Contact Details

Corresponding address:
John A Spencer,
Department of Clinical Radiology,
Leeds Cancer Centre at St James's University Hospital,
Leeds LS9 7TF, UK

Reference

ICIS Cancer Imaging Volume 6 Issue 1
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.0022

Date Posted

7 September 2006


Open Access Article Open Access is provided for this article.

Print PDF

Size

502.63 KB

Minimum Estimated Download Times

ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband):

1 second

ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband):

7 seconds

64 Kb/s (ISDN):

1 minute 2 seconds

33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem):

2 minutes 0 seconds

Screen PDF

Size

335.31 KB

Minimum Estimated Download Times

ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband):

1 second

ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband):

5 seconds

64 Kb/s (ISDN):

41 seconds

33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem):

1 minute 20 seconds

No part of this publication or site may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher, e-MED Limited, Permissions, PO Box 66356, London, E14 1GW. Tel: +44 (0)207 719 8989 Fax: +44 (0)560 126 4446, permissions@cancerimaging.org.

© 2000-2010 International Cancer Imaging Society