Peer Review
Cancer Imaging
ISSN 1470-7330
Search site with:PicoSearch


Content
Current Issue
Archive
Related Journals / Articles
Information
Aims and Scope
Editors and Board
Editorial Policy
Instructions for Authors
Copyright Transfer Form
Subscription Information
Advertising
Society
Aims
Membership
Annual Meeting
Communications
Bulletin Board
Send Email to ICIS
e-Med
Visit e-Med Web Site
Journals
Purchase
“To Promote Education in Cancer Imaging in the Multidisciplinary Management of Malignancy”

Home > Articles

Response to chemotherapy in patients with lung metastases: how many nodules should be measured? Open Access Article

Abstract

Objective: With the introduction of cross-sectional imaging methods the number of lesions per patient that can be evaluated is frequently large and most oncologists and study protocols use only one lesion or a few `representative' lesions to evaluate chemotherapy response. Intra-patient response variability can therefore affect evaluation reproducibility. This study evaluates intra-individual variation in response to chemotherapy in patients with multiple lung metastases. Methods: We prospectively studied chest CT images of patients with solid tumors and pulmonary metastases under systemic chemotherapy being evaluated for tumor response. The response of 566 pulmonary nodules in 41 evaluations was determined by both WHO and RECIST criteria in order to determine intra-individual tumor response variation. Results: There was almost perfect agreement between the WHO and the RECIST criteria for the evaluation of tumor response. High intra-individual variability of tumor response was observed in a significant proportion of the evaluations. A new nodule was the main criterion for determination of disease progression. A mean of 35% of the total number of nodules of a patient have a response evaluation different from that calculated with all the nodules together. Conclusions: Intra-individual variation in tumor response of pulmonary metastases is elevated in some patients. Selecting any or some nodules for response evaluation could significantly influence therapeutic response perception.

Author

R Chojniak, L S Yu and R N Younes

Contact Details

Corresponding address:
Rubens Chojniak, MD PhD,
Department of Radiology,
Hospital do Cancer A C Camargo,
rua Prof. Antonio Prudente 211,
Liberdade, Sao Paulo, Brazil 01509-010

Reference

ICIS Cancer Imaging Volume 6 Issue 1
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2006.0017

Date Posted

13 July 2006


Open Access Article Open Access is provided for this article.

Screen PDF

Size

253.45 KB

Minimum Estimated Download Times

ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband):

1 second

ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband):

3 seconds

64 Kb/s (ISDN):

31 seconds

33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem):

60 seconds

Print PDF

Size

308.20 KB

Minimum Estimated Download Times

ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband):

1 second

ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband):

4 seconds

64 Kb/s (ISDN):

38 seconds

33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem):

1 minute 14 seconds

No part of this publication or site may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher, e-MED Limited, Permissions, PO Box 61053, London, SE16 7YZ. Tel: +44 (0)207 719 8989 Fax: +44 (0)560 126 4446, permissions@cancerimaging.org.

© 2000-2009 International Cancer Imaging Society