|
Home > Articles
Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) in uro-oncology has been one of the slowest areas to develop. There are problems because of the excretion of tracer through the renal tract. Its use in prostate cancer has generally being disappointing, with PET being unable to differentiate malignancy from benign prostatic hypertrophy. In more advanced disease and in the search for the site of recurrence, PET can be of more use. Also, new tracers may prove to be more effective. PET has been shown to be of value in testicular cancer, particularly in defining recurrent disease in residual masses and in patients with raised markers. There is a clear place for PET in some of these cases. Early studies at staging are promising but more work is required to define its exact place. In renal and bladder cancer, PET may be a useful adjunct to conventional imaging in difficult cases and may assist in local staging. In all tumours it is valuable to differentiate fibrosis from recurrent disease in the treatment bed, an area of difficulty for CT/MR.
Author
S F Hain
Contact Details
Corresponding address: S F Hain
Department of Nuclear Medicine,
Charing Cross Hospital,
Fulham Palace Road,
London W6 8RF,
UK
Reference
ICIS Cancer Imaging Volume 5 Issue 1
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2005.0001
Date Posted
17 January 2005
Print PDF
Size
4.22 MB
Minimum Estimated Download Times
ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband): |
16 seconds |
ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband): |
1 minute 7 seconds |
64 Kb/s (ISDN): |
9 minutes 0 seconds |
33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem): |
17 minutes 18 seconds |
Screen PDF
Size
365.47 KB
Minimum Estimated Download Times
ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband): |
1 second |
ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband): |
5 seconds |
64 Kb/s (ISDN): |
45 seconds |
33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem): |
1 minute 27 seconds |
|