|
Home > Articles
[18F]FDG-PET in lung cancer: current status
Abstract
Increasingly, evidence of safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is required to support funding of new diagnostic technologies. However, diagnostic imaging is a rapidly changing speciality with new data constantly being added to the evidence base. This article aims to review the evidence base for the application of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) in lung cancer and to identify areas in which the evidence base is evolving. Currently, there is strong evidence for [18F]FDG-PET in characterisation of pulmonary nodules when there is a relative contra-indication for needle biopsy or when biopsy results are indeterminate, and for staging patients with non-small cell lung cancer without enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes on computed tomography (CT). Evidence is emerging for a role in patients undergoing radiotherapy but the impact on outcomes and cost-effectiveness is unknown. For patients with small cell lung cancer, [18F]FDG-PET can change clinical management but cost-effectiveness is yet to be evaluated is this patient group. PET/CT is more accurate than PET alone but it is unclear how this technology can be most effectively and cost-effectively incorporated into management pathways. The potential impact of quantitative
contrast-enhanced CT on the cost-effectiveness of [18F]FDG-PET in characterisation of pulmonary nodules illustrates the need for continual re-evaluation of the evidence base as new techniques emerge.
Author
K A Miles
Contact Details
Corresponding address: Division of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation,
Brighton & Sussex Medical School,
University of Sussex,
Falmer,
Brighton,
BN1 9PX, UK.
E-mail: k.a.miles@bsms.ac.uk
Reference
ICIS Cancer Imaging Volume 4 Special Issue B
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0032
Date Posted
3 January 2005
Print PDF
Size
3.72 MB
Minimum Estimated Download Times
ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband): |
14 seconds |
ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband): |
59 seconds |
64 Kb/s (ISDN): |
7 minutes 56 seconds |
33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem): |
15 minutes 15 seconds |
Screen PDF
Size
240.40 KB
Minimum Estimated Download Times
ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband): |
1 second |
ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband): |
3 seconds |
64 Kb/s (ISDN): |
30 seconds |
33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem): |
57 seconds |
|