Peer Review
Cancer Imaging
ISSN 1470-7330
Search site with:PicoSearch


Content
Current Issue
Archive
Related Journals / Articles
Information
Aims and Scope
Editors and Board
Editorial Policy
Instructions for Authors
Copyright Transfer Form
Subscription Information
Advertising
Society
Aims
Membership
Annual Meeting
Communications
Bulletin Board
Send Email to ICIS
e-Med
Visit e-Med Web Site
Journals
Purchase
“To Promote Education in Cancer Imaging in the Multidisciplinary Management of Malignancy”

Home > Articles

Lymphoma: Imaging in the Evaluation of Residual Masses Open Access Article

Abstract

In the management of patients with lymphoma, imaging is essential not only for diagnosis but also to define prognosis and treatment by staging. Imaging is also used to assess the response to treatment that may affect the treatment strategy: new chemotherapeutic drug combinations and autologous stem cell transplantation. These different therapies have increased the need for higher accuracy to assess the response to treatment. Standardised imaging response criteria must be well known by radiologists involved in the management of patients with lymphoma. Criteria are mainly volumetric, and are obtained from CT scans. Functional imaging techniques have been shown to provide better information on the viability of residual masses than does CT assessment of size changes. CT remains the main imaging technique to assess response to treatment based on volumetric international criteria. New functional imaging tools evaluating perfusion (CT and MRI), and particularly glucose uptake (PET), will probably play an important role in bringing additional information on the metabolism of lymphomatous masses.

Author

A Rahmouni, M Divine, S Kriaa, C Haïoun, M-C Anglade, and H Kobeiter

Contact Details

Corresponding address:
Departments of Radiology and Hematology,
Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Henri Mondor,
Créteil,
France

Reference

ICIS Cancer Imaging Volume 2
DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2002.0008

Date Posted

31 July 2002


Open Access Article Open Access is provided for this article.

Screen PDF

Size

184.90 KB

Minimum Estimated Download Times

ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband):

1 second

ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband):

2 seconds

64 Kb/s (ISDN):

23 seconds

33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem):

44 seconds

Print PDF

Size

33.89 KB

Minimum Estimated Download Times

ADSL 2Mb/s (Broadband):

1 second

ADSL 512Kb/s (Broadband):

1 second

64 Kb/s (ISDN):

4 seconds

33.3 Kb/s (Typical Modem):

8 seconds

No part of this publication or site may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Publisher, e-MED Limited, Permissions, PO Box 61053, London, SE16 7YZ. Tel: +44 (0)207 719 8989 Fax: +44 (0)560 126 4446, permissions@cancerimaging.org.

© 2000-2009 International Cancer Imaging Society